首页> 外文OA文献 >Not Yet the Post-TV Era: Network and MVPD Adaptation to Emergent Distribution Technologies
【2h】

Not Yet the Post-TV Era: Network and MVPD Adaptation to Emergent Distribution Technologies

机译:还不是后电视时代:网络和MVPD对新兴发行技术的适应

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Television as a medium is in transition. From DVRs, to Netflix, to HBO Now, consumers have never before had such control over how they consume televisual content. The rapid changes to the medium have led to rhetoric heralding the impending“post-TV era.” Looking at the ways that legacy television companies have adapted to new technologies and cultural practices suggests that rather than traditional television going the way of radio, television as a medium is actually not terribly different, at least not enough to conclude that we have entered a new era. Press releases, discursive practices by the news media, corporate structures and investments, and audience research all point to the rhetoric of post-TV as being overblown. By thinking about contemporary television as being in transition, greater emphasis and attention can be placed on the role that major media conglomerates play in developing, funding, and legitimizing new forms of television distribution, in addition to co-opting disruptive technologies and business models while hindering others. (author's abstract)
机译:电视作为一种媒介正在过渡。从DVR到Netflix,再到HBO Now,消费者从未像现在这样控制过他们消费电视内容的方式。媒体的迅速变化导致雄辩的言论预示了即将到来的“后电视时代”。从传统电视公司对新技术和文化实践的适应方式来看,电视作为一种媒介,与其说传统电视不像广播那样,倒不如说是完全不同,至少不足以断定我们已经进入了新的时代。时代。新闻稿,新闻媒体的话语做法,公司结构和投资以及受众研究都表明,后电视的言论过于夸张。通过考虑当代电视正在过渡中,除了可以选择颠覆性技术和商业模式之外,可以将更多的注意力和注意力放在主要媒体集团在开发,资助和使新形式的电视发行合法化方面所起的作用。妨碍别人。 (作者的摘要)

著录项

  • 作者

    Esler, Mike van;

  • 作者单位
  • 年度 2016
  • 总页数
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种
  • 中图分类

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号